Why species loss destabilises an ecosystem — practice questions
4 questions in the bank on this idea. Below are 4 of them, exactly as they appear in a test.
What does the rivet popper hypothesis illustrate about biodiversity loss?
- A. Species loss can progressively weaken ecosystem function
- B. Every species can be removed because ecological roles are completely interchangeable
- C. Species loss always improves stability
- D. Only large animals affect ecosystems
Which feature is generally associated with a more stable ecosystem?
- A. Large year-to-year fluctuations in productivity despite otherwise unchanged conditions
- B. Lower variation in productivity between years
- C. Complete absence of consumers
- D. No response to environmental change
A plant community loses several pollinator species, and seed production then falls in many plants. What does this best demonstrate?
- A. Pollinators are unrelated to plant reproduction
- B. Only plants are affected by biodiversity loss
- C. Species loss can propagate through ecological interactions
- D. Ecosystem species function independently, so losses cannot affect interacting partners
Two grasslands experience the same drought. The more species-rich grassland shows smaller changes in total biomass and recovers faster. Which inference best fits biodiversity-stability ideas?
- A. Drought has no measurable ecological effect once a community contains many species
- B. Higher diversity guarantees no species ever declines
- C. Lower diversity always produces more biomass
- D. Greater diversity can buffer ecosystem function
Want to know which of these you would get wrong?
Reading a question and answering it under a clock are different things. Take the 20-question diagnostic and see where the marks actually go.
Start the diagnostic →